“I do not believe the United States is well served by a policy that says it is OK to be immoral in any way.”Does this mean he agrees that there should be adverse consequences for generals who, in uniform, speak at church functions in order to help sell the notion of a "holy war" between a putative Christendom and Islam? Does he believe troops who appear in uniform to support a certain party's political agenda should be punished? Would he support troops who disobeyed illegal orders to, say, torture people or otherwise violate the UCMJ or Geneva Conventions?
And -- no offense to all the hetero men and women in uniform -- is there anything more homo-hot (in a totally Spartan way, of course) than the military?
All of these questions are rhetorical, aren't they? My bad.
UPDATE: Shorter Pace non-apology: "d00d, sorry ur a f4gg0rtz."
Labels: abu Gonzales, common sense, crypto-fascism, jingoism, Republican't stooges, stupidity, talebangelical cats, war on tair, wingnuttery
