have you no....?

nevermind.

• Posted at 7:28 PM | By  mdhatter

No, no, Gregor: for Piss Christ's sake -- remember, it's art!

mdhatter: Did you even have to begin to ask?

• Posted at 7:43 PM | By  teh l4m3

Very nice...it's also possible that he's a grower...

• Posted at 9:31 PM | By  Midniter

True, dat. Then again, he's 6'3", so objectively speaking, it isn't really that small.

Of course, the real turn-off is that he's stuck it in the Black Eyed Peas' Fergie -- repeatedly.

• Posted at 9:43 PM | By  teh l4m3

I may be missing something, but I don't think that picture is a pic of Josh Duhamel...the face doesn't look right.

I can see how other people might have missed that, but I felt it necessary to direct the attention skyward for a moment of clarity.

oxuvwpf: not touching this one.

• Posted at 7:34 AM | By  Chuckles

i am SOOOOO glad i checked this at home and not at work...

• Posted at 8:30 AM | By  pop renaissance

PR: Please, you post nugs on your blog. A little meat & potatoes ain't gonna hurt none.

Chuckles: It is so.

• Posted at 10:14 AM | By  teh l4m3

I'd say he was tumescent in that picture. I'd also say that he's jutting out, so to speak, in front of himself (out of the shadow and into the light). I'm guessing a minimum of 7" at full attention, maybe a bit more. Quite respectable. Plus, it's Josh Duhamel, so how much do you really need? (Unless you're the lumpy-humpy BEP girl. SO wrong.)

My goodness, I've put an awful lot of thought into Josh Duhamel's penis.

• Posted at 9:34 PM | By  madamerouge

madame, I would say slightly tumescent -- not quite a full salute. A semi, if you will.

And if you put enough thought into it, it may come to you...

eraythr: that, in this context, is just so wrong.

• Posted at 10:05 PM | By  teh l4m3

Me likes! Thank you teh. You are very sweet to dedicate something to me and the boys.

Unlike others, who shall remain nameless, I will accept the picture of good looking boy without complaints.

• Posted at 1:49 PM | By  Unknown